AMD EPYC 4584PX vs AMD EPYC 9754
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 4584PX and AMD EPYC 9754 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4584PX
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher clock speed: 5.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 360 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3924 vs 2329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 vs 13 Jun 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 360 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3924 vs 2329 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9754
- 112 more cores, run more applications at once: 128 vs 16
- 224 more threads: 256 vs 32
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 130045 vs 60387
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 128 vs 16 |
| Number of threads | 256 vs 32 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) vs 128 MB (shared) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130045 vs 60387 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 4584PX
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9754
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 4584PX | AMD EPYC 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3924 | 2329 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 60387 | 130045 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 4584PX | AMD EPYC 9754 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 | 13 Jun 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $11900 |
| Place in performance rating | 69 | 53 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 4.2 GHz | 2.25 GHz |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm² | 8x 73 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47°C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 89°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 5.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 16 | 128 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 256 |
| Transistor count | 17,840 million | 71,000 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | AM5 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 360 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
