AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7302P and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7302P

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 10 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 6
• 20 more threads: 32 vs 12
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.7x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32690 vs 11636

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

• Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 155 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1962 vs 1893

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7302P
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1893 1962
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	32690 11636

Compare specifications (specs)