AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7302P and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7302P

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 8
• 16 more threads: 32 vs 16
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32626 vs 14693

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

• Around 12% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 155 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2027 vs 1877

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7302P
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1877 2027
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	32626 14693

Compare specifications (specs)