AMD EPYC 7F72 vs AMD EPYC 9124
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7F72 and AMD EPYC 9124 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7F72
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 16
- 16 more threads: 48 vs 32
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 786432x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3145728x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2384 vs 2309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 16 |
| Number of threads | 48 vs 32 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) vs 64MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2384 vs 2309 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9124
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 240 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 61825 vs 52740
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2022 vs 14 Apr 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 240 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 61825 vs 52740 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7F72
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9124
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 7F72 | AMD EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2384 | 2309 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 52740 | 61825 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 7F72 | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 14 Apr 2020 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | 453 | 395 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1083 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Die size | 74 mm² | 4x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 16 |
| Number of threads | 48 | 32 |
| Transistor count | 3,800 million | 26,280 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | SP3 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 240 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 200-240 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 4 | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
