AMD EPYC 8324PN vs AMD EPYC 8224PN
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 8324PN and AMD EPYC 8224PN processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8324PN
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 24
- 16 more threads: 64 vs 48
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 32 vs 24 |
Number of threads | 64 vs 48 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) vs 64 MB (shared) |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8224PN
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD EPYC 8324PN | AMD EPYC 8224PN | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 | 18 Sep 2023 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2125 | $1015 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2000 MHz |
Die size | 4x 73 mm² | 2x 73 mm² |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85°C | 85°C |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 32 | 24 |
Number of threads | 64 | 48 |
Transistor count | 35,500 million | 17,750 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | SP6 | SP6 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) |