AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC Embedded 3251

• CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
• 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13912 vs 11813

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

• Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1993 vs 1881

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC Embedded 3251
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1881 1993
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	13912 11813

Compare specifications (specs)