AMD FX-9370 vs Intel Core i5-3550
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-9370 and Intel Core i5-3550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9370
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 4.7 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6273 vs 4800
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2981 vs 2526
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.983 vs 3.362
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 29.981 vs 9.39
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.431 vs 0.404
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.125 vs 5.067
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2013 vs 23 April 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.7 GHz vs 3.70 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6273 vs 4800 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2981 vs 2526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.983 vs 3.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.981 vs 9.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.431 vs 0.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.125 vs 5.067 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3550
- Around 18% higher maximum core temperature: 67.4°C vs 57°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 77 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1993 vs 1695
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 767 vs 607
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.919 vs 1.427
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum core temperature | 67.4°C vs 57°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 77 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1993 vs 1695 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 767 vs 607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.919 vs 1.427 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-9370
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3550
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-9370 | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1695 | 1993 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6273 | 4800 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 607 | 767 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2981 | 2526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.983 | 3.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.981 | 9.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.431 | 0.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 1.919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.125 | 5.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-9370 | Intel Core i5-3550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Vishera | Ivy Bridge |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | July 2013 | 23 April 2012 |
OPN PIB | FD9370FHHKWOF | |
OPN Tray | FD9370FHW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 2493 | 2498 |
Price now | $178.89 | $329.95 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.59 | 6.19 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $205 | |
Processor Number | i5-3550 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 4.4 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Die size | 315 mm | 160 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 57°C | 67.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.7 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 1400 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | FCLGA1155 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 77 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x152 | |
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |