AMD FX-9590 vs AMD Phenom X4 9850B

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-9590 and AMD Phenom X4 9850B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
  • Around 100% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 65 nm
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 83% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1813 vs 992
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6788 vs 1946
Specifications (specs)
Launch date July 2013 vs August 2008
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 8 vs 4
Maximum frequency 5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm SOI vs 65 nm
L2 cache 8 MB vs 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 8 MB vs 2048 KB (shared)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1813 vs 992
PassMark - CPU mark 6788 vs 1946

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9850B

  • Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 220 Watt
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt vs 220 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-9590
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9850B

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1813
992
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
6788
1946
Name AMD FX-9590 AMD Phenom X4 9850B
PassMark - Single thread mark 1813 992
PassMark - CPU mark 6788 1946
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 633
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 3042
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 3336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 25.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.418
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.59

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FX-9590 AMD Phenom X4 9850B

Essentials

Architecture codename Vishera Agena
Family AMD FX-Series Processors
Launch date July 2013 August 2008
OPN PIB FD9590FHHKWOF
OPN Tray FD9590FHW8KHK
Place in performance rating 2292 2275
Price now $99.99
Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Value for money (0-100) 30.03
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 4.7 GHz
Die size 315 mm 285 mm
L1 cache 384 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 8 MB 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 8 MB 2048 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm SOI 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 57°C
Maximum frequency 5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Number of cores 8 4
Number of threads 8
P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V
Transistor count 1200 million 450 million
Unlocked

Memory

Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3+ AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 220 Watt 95 Watt

Peripherals

PCI Express revision n / a

Advanced Technologies

Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)