AMD FX-9590 vs AMD A4-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-9590 and AMD A4-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590

• CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
• 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
• Around 28% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1813 vs 1402
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6788 vs 1428
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 633 vs 440
• 4.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3042 vs 696
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.765 vs 2.112
• 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 25.735 vs 2.119
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.45 vs 0.1

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-6300

• Around 23% higher maximum core temperature: 70°C vs 57°C
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 220 Watt
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.647 vs 1.418
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.25 vs 8.59

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-9590
CPU 2: AMD A4-6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1813 1402
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6788 1428
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	633 440
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	3042 696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	10.765 2.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	25.735 2.119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.45 0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1.418 6.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	8.59 21.25

Compare specifications (specs)