AMD GX-424CC vs Intel Celeron 2957U
Comparative analysis of AMD GX-424CC and Intel Celeron 2957U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD GX-424CC
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | 6 June 2014 vs 1 January 2014 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 2957U
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 74.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 524 vs 7
- 74.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 524 vs 7
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1874 vs 924
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1874 vs 924
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2698
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90 °C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 524 vs 7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 524 vs 7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1874 vs 924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1874 vs 924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 vs 2698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 vs 2698 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD GX-424CC
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2957U
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD GX-424CC | Intel Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 924 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 924 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2698 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2698 | 3071 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 780 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 855 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.97 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.97 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD GX-424CC | Intel Celeron 2957U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Steppe Eagle | Haswell |
| Family | AMD G-Series | |
| Launch date | 6 June 2014 | 1 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 2214 | 1970 |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Processor Number | 2957U | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2400 MHz | 1.40 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 497 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R5E | Intel HD Graphics |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | BGA769 (FT3b) | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 10 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCI support | ||
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD GX-424CC with others
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7370
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelAtom x7-E3950
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelCore i7-2610UE
AMDGX-424CC vs
AMDE1-6015
AMDGX-424CC vs
AppleA8
AMDGX-424CC vs
AppleA8X
