AMD E1-6015 vs AMD GX-424CC

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6015 and AMD GX-424CC processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6015

• 56.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 393 vs 7
• 56.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 393 vs 7
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 985 vs 924
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 985 vs 924

Reasons to consider the AMD GX-424CC

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2698 vs 2454
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2698 vs 2454

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-6015
CPU 2: AMD GX-424CC

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	393 7
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	393 7
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	985 924
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	985 924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2454 2698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2454 2698

Compare specifications (specs)