AMD GX-424CC vs Intel Core M-5Y10c
Comparative analysis of AMD GX-424CC and Intel Core M-5Y10c processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD GX-424CC
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y10c
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 90 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 122.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 857 vs 7
- 122.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 857 vs 7
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1613 vs 924
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1613 vs 924
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2750 vs 2698
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2750 vs 2698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 December 2014 vs 6 June 2014 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C vs 90 °C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 vs 7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 vs 7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 vs 924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 vs 924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 vs 2698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 vs 2698 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD GX-424CC
CPU 2: Intel Core M-5Y10c
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD GX-424CC | Intel Core M-5Y10c |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 924 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 924 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2698 | 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2698 | 2750 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1128 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1901 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD GX-424CC | Intel Core M-5Y10c | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Steppe Eagle | Broadwell |
| Family | AMD G-Series | |
| Launch date | 6 June 2014 | 1 December 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 2147 | 1897 |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Price now | $281 | |
| Processor Number | 5Y10c | |
| Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.95 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Die size | 82 mm | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 497 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R5E | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 |
| Device ID | 0x161E | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 16 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | BGA769 (FT3b) | FCBGA1234 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD GX-424CC with others
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelCore i7-3615QM
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelCore i3-5157U
AMDGX-424CC vs
IntelAtom x7-E3950
AMDGX-424CC vs
AMDE1-6015
AMDGX-424CC vs
AppleA8
AMDGX-424CC vs
AppleA8X
