AMD Mobile Sempron M100 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

Comparative analysis of AMD Mobile Sempron M100 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron M100

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1102 vs 873

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 681 vs 546
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 637 vs 332
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1465 vs 1051

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Mobile Sempron M100
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	546 681
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	332 637
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1102 873
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1051 1465

Compare specifications (specs)