AMD Opteron 6308 vs AMD Opteron 148
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 6308 and AMD Opteron 148 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6308
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 130 nm |
| L1 cache | 192 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1024 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 148
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 115 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 6308
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 148
| Name | AMD Opteron 6308 | AMD Opteron 148 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.163 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 443 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 392 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron 6308 | AMD Opteron 148 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD Opteron | |
| OPN Tray | OS6308WKT4GHK | |
| Place in performance rating | 3029 | 3091 |
| Series | AMD Opteron 6300 Series Processor | |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer | |
| Launch date | November 2003 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C | |
| Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 193 mm | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 106 million | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 2000 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | G34 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 89 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
