AMD Opteron 6308 vs AMD Opteron 150
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 6308 and AMD Opteron 150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6308
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 192 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1024 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 6308
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 150
Name | AMD Opteron 6308 | AMD Opteron 150 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.163 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 471 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 6308 | AMD Opteron 150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD Opteron | |
OPN Tray | OS6308WKT4GHK | |
Place in performance rating | 3018 | 3042 |
Series | AMD Opteron 6300 Series Processor | |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | Venus | |
Launch date | August 2005 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 16 MB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C | |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 193 mm | |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
Transistor count | 106 million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 2000 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | G34 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 85 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |