AMD Opteron 842 vs AMD Opteron 848

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 842 and AMD Opteron 848 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 842

  • Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 82 Watt vs 89 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 82 Watt vs 89 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 848

  • Around 38% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 842 AMD Opteron 848

Essentials

Architecture codename SledgeHammer SledgeHammer
Launch date May 2004 May 2004
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 193 mm 193 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 106 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 940 940
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 82 Watt 89 Watt

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Opteron 842 with others

AMD Opteron 842 AMD
Opteron 842
vs Intel Pentium M 735 Intel
Pentium M 735
AMD Opteron 842 AMD
Opteron 842
vs AMD Opteron 850 AMD
Opteron 850
AMD Opteron 842 AMD
Opteron 842
vs AMD Opteron 848 AMD
Opteron 848