AMD Phenom II X4 910 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 910 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 910
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 988 vs 746
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1776 vs 653
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | February 2009 vs April 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 988 vs 746 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1776 vs 653 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 910
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom II X4 910 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 988 | 746 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1776 | 653 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 361 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom II X4 910 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Deneb | Brisbane |
| Launch date | February 2009 | April 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $100 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2649 | 2650 |
| Price now | $100 | $24.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.58 | 18.01 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 258 mm | 126 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 758 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 89 Watt |
