AMD Phenom X4 9550 vs Intel Pentium III 1400
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9550 and Intel Pentium III 1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9550
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 57% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 64x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | March 2008 vs December 2001 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium III 1400
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 31.2 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31.2 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9550
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 1400
| Name | AMD Phenom X4 9550 | Intel Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 286 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 808 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.146 | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 272 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom X4 9550 | Intel Pentium III 1400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Agena | Tualatin |
| Launch date | March 2008 | December 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 3266 | 3268 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 285 mm | 80 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 450 million | 44 million |
| Base frequency | 1.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 133 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 69°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1.5V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2+ | PPGA370 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 31.2 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||