AMD Phenom X4 9550 vs AMD Sempron 3500+
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9550 and AMD Sempron 3500+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9550
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | March 2008 vs May 2006 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3500+
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9550
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3500+
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9550 | AMD Sempron 3500+ |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 286 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 808 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.65 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.175 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.146 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 264 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 232 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | AMD Sempron 3500+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Manila |
Launch date | March 2008 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3254 | 3262 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $167 | |
Price now | $20 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.65 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 62 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |