AMD Phenom X4 9750B vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9750B and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9750B
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 913 vs 763
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1520 vs 671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | August 2008 vs May 2006 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 913 vs 763 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1520 vs 671 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9750B
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9750B | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 913 | 763 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1520 | 671 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1044 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1731 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9750B | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ EE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Windsor |
Launch date | August 2008 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 2384 | 2358 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 220 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 154 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |