AMD Ryzen 3 3100 vs AMD Athlon 3000G

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and AMD Athlon 3000G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 3100

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2421 vs 1987
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 11618 vs 4490

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 3000G

• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 3100
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 3000G

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2421 1987
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	11618 4490

Compare specifications (specs)