AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs AMD A4-7300

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and AMD A4-7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

vs

AMD A4-7300

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 36% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 70°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 886 vs 442
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2901 vs 681
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2195 vs 1480
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 7071 vs 1534

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
CPU 2: AMD A4-7300

Compare specifications (specs)