AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs AMD FX-4150

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and AMD FX-4150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 32 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2195 vs 1465
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 7071 vs 3327

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-4150

• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
CPU 2: AMD FX-4150

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2195 1465
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	7071 3327

Compare specifications (specs)