AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1913 vs 1571

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2

• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 12119 vs 6143

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1913 1571
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6143 12119

Compare specifications (specs)