AMD Ryzen 5 1400 vs AMD FX-6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 1400 and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
- Around 35% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 70.50°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1887 vs 1486
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 7736 vs 4220
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 772 vs 527
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3027 vs 1914
- Around 63% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 3393 vs 2087
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.088 vs 6.894
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.532 vs 16.151
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.586 vs 0.339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 April 2017 vs October 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of threads | 8 vs 6 |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 70.50°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 288 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1887 vs 1486 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 7736 vs 4220 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 772 vs 527 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3027 vs 1914 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3393 vs 2087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.088 vs 6.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.532 vs 16.151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.586 vs 0.339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
L2 cache | 6 MB vs 2 MB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 1400
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1887 | 1486 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 7736 | 4220 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 772 | 527 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3027 | 1914 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3393 | 2087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.088 | 6.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.532 | 16.151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.586 | 0.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | AMD FX-6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Vishera |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
Launch date | 11 April 2017 | October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $170 | |
OPN PIB | YD1400BBAEBOX | FD6300WMHKBOX |
OPN Tray | YD1400BBM4KAE | FD6300WMW6KHK |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 1973 | 2673 |
Price now | $119.99 | $58.99 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.60 | 31.81 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Die size | 192 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 288 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 70.50°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 6 |
Transistor count | 4800 Million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x16 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
Extended Frequency Range (XFR) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |