AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

• CPU is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz
• Around 45% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 72.4°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 45 nm
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2426 vs 1234
• 11.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 14309 vs 1210
• Around 83% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 4400 vs 2400

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2426 1234
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	14309 1210
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2	4400 2400

Compare specifications (specs)