AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Intel Core i9-9820X

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Intel Core i9-9820X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

• CPU is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 10
• 4 more threads: 24 vs 20
• Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 4.10 GHz
• Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 92°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 20% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3.9x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 165 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2692 vs 2453
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 31609 vs 20045

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-9820X

• Around 67% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 10201 vs 8013

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-9820X

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2692 2453
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	31609 20045
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2	8013 10201

Compare specifications (specs)