AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs AMD RX-427BB

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and AMD RX-427BB processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD RX-427BB

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• Around 116029% higher clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3.1 GHz
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
CPU 2: AMD RX-427BB

Compare specifications (specs)