AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs AMD A6-9500

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 and AMD A6-9500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2037 vs 1630
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6883 vs 1879

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9500

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514
CPU 2: AMD A6-9500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2037 1630
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6883 1879

Compare specifications (specs)