AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 68°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 12x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 180 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 4
• 24 more threads: 32 vs 8
• Around 8% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2274 vs 1933
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 27618 vs 6998

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1933 2274
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6998 27618

Compare specifications (specs)