AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Intel Core i9-7920X

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 and Intel Core i9-7920X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 140 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-7920X

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
• 16 more threads: 24 vs 8
• Around 16% higher clock speed: 4.30 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2506 vs 1933
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 23616 vs 6998

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-7920X

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1933 2506
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6998 23616

Compare specifications (specs)