AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs AMD A10-7890K

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and AMD A10-7890K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2492 vs 1589
• 7.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 25236 vs 3558

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7890K

• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 72.40°C vs 68°C
• Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 180 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
CPU 2: AMD A10-7890K

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2492 1589
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	25236 3558

Compare specifications (specs)