AMD Sempron 2600+ vs AMD Sempron 2400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 2600+ and AMD Sempron 2400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2600+
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 325 vs 321
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 253 vs 205
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | August 2004 vs January 2001 |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 325 vs 321 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 253 vs 205 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2400+
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 1.67 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 1.67 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 2600+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 2400+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Sempron 2600+ | AMD Sempron 2400+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 325 | 321 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 253 | 205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 2600+ | AMD Sempron 2400+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Palermo | Barton |
Launch date | August 2004 | January 2001 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | $27 |
Place in performance rating | 3223 | 3225 |
Price now | $34.95 | $27 |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.14 | 3.42 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 84 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 754 | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 62 Watt |