AMD Sempron 3850 vs AMD Athlon 5350

Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3850 and AMD Athlon 5350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3850

• Around 18% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 76°C
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 808 vs 245
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2143 vs 796
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.923 vs 3.385
• 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 92.125 vs 7.63
• 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.005 vs 1.821

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 5350

• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 699 vs 449
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1802 vs 1174
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 vs 0.095
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.011 vs 5.897
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 592 vs 459
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1136 vs 789
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3232 vs 1983
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 592 vs 459
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1136 vs 789
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3232 vs 1983

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3850
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 5350

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	449 699
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1174 1802
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	808 245
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2143 796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	3.923 3.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	92.125 7.63
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.095 0.175
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	5.897 7.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	15.005 1.821
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	459 592
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	789 1136
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1983 3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	459 592
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	789 1136
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1983 3232

Compare specifications (specs)