AMD Sempron 3850 vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3850 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 620 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3850

• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• Around 33% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 67.7°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 9.1x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 84 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 808 vs 801
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2143 vs 906

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3850
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 HT 620

Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	808 801
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2143 906

Compare specifications (specs)