AMD Turion 64 MT-28 vs AMD Athlon 64 2700+

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion 64 MT-28 and AMD Athlon 64 2700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 MT-28

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
  • Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 419 vs 398
Specifications (specs)
Launch date June 2005 vs April 2004
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm vs 130 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 419 vs 398

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion 64 MT-28
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 2700+

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
419
398
Name AMD Turion 64 MT-28 AMD Athlon 64 2700+
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 0
PassMark - CPU mark 419 398

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Turion 64 MT-28 AMD Athlon 64 2700+

Essentials

Architecture codename Lancaster NewCastle
Launch date June 2005 April 2004
Place in performance rating 3341 3342
Series Turion 64
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 125 mm 144 mm
Front-side bus (FSB) 800 MHz
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Number of threads 1
Transistor count 114 million 69 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 754 754
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 32 Watt

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Turion 64 MT-28 with others

AMD Turion 64 MT-28 AMD
Turion 64 MT-28
vs AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD
Athlon 64 2700+