AMD Turion 64 MT-40 vs AMD Turion 64 MT-28
Comparative analysis of AMD Turion 64 MT-40 and AMD Turion 64 MT-28 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 MT-40
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 536 vs 419
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | August 2005 vs June 2005 |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 536 vs 419 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Turion 64 MT-40
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 MT-28
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Turion 64 MT-40 | AMD Turion 64 MT-28 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 536 | 419 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Turion 64 MT-40 | AMD Turion 64 MT-28 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Lancaster | Lancaster |
Launch date | August 2005 | June 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3327 | 3341 |
Series | Turion 64 | Turion 64 |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 125 mm | 125 mm |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Number of threads | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 114 million | 114 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 754 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |