AMD Turion II Neo K625 vs AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion II Neo K625 and AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Neo K625

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 631 vs 488
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 618 vs 278

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

• Around 7% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion II Neo K625
CPU 2: AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	631 488
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	618 278

Compare specifications (specs)