AMD Turion II Ultra M600 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-60

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion II Ultra M600 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Ultra M600

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 987 vs 654
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 955 vs 652
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1442 vs 832
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2456 vs 1418

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion II Ultra M600
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-60

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	987 654
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	955 652
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1442 832
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2456 1418

Compare specifications (specs)