AMD Turion II Ultra M600 vs AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion II Ultra M600 and AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Ultra M600

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 14% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 987 vs 637
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 955 vs 245
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1442 vs 887
• 3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2456 vs 829

Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion II Ultra M600
CPU 2: AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	987 637
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	955 245
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1442 887
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2456 829

Compare specifications (specs)