AMD Turion X2 RM-75 vs AMD Opteron X2 290
Comparative analysis of AMD Turion X2 RM-75 and AMD Opteron X2 290 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 RM-75
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs January 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 290
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Turion X2 RM-75
CPU 2: AMD Opteron X2 290
Name | AMD Turion X2 RM-75 | AMD Opteron X2 290 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 783 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 727 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 930 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.959 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Turion X2 RM-75 | AMD Opteron X2 290 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Lion | Italy |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 | January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 2910 | not rated |
Series | 2x AMD Turion | |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 4000 MHz | |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Transistor count | 233 million | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Sockets supported | S1 | 940 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |