Intel Atom C2558 vs AMD A10-5745M
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom C2558 and AMD A10-5745M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom C2558
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5745M
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 945 vs 512
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1782 vs 1424
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 945 vs 512 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1782 vs 1424 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom C2558
CPU 2: AMD A10-5745M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Atom C2558 | AMD A10-5745M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 512 | 945 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1424 | 1782 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 304 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 802 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.126 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Atom C2558 | AMD A10-5745M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Rangeley | Richland |
Launch date | Q3'13 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 2917 | 2811 |
Processor Number | C2558 | |
Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor C Series | AMD A-Series |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Die size | 246 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3/DDR3L 1600 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 34 mm x 28 mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1283 | FP2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
Integrated LAN | ||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
Number of USB ports | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2 | |
PCIe configurations | x1,x2,x4,x8,x16 | |
Total number of SATA ports | 6 | |
UART | ||
USB revision | 2 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Integrated Intel® QuickAssist Technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |