Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Celeron N2930
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom Z3795 and Intel Celeron N2930 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z3795
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2.39 GHz vs 2.16 GHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 640 vs 582
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1188 vs 1014
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 217 vs 196
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 743 vs 655
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.692 vs 1.617
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.39 GHz vs 2.16 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 640 vs 582 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1188 vs 1014 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 217 vs 196 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 743 vs 655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.692 vs 1.617 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2930
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.122 vs 8.148
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.154 vs 0.144
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1231 vs 875
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1231 vs 875
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.917 vs 2.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.122 vs 8.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.154 vs 0.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1231 vs 875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 vs 875 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom Z3795
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2930
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Atom Z3795 | Intel Celeron N2930 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 640 | 582 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1188 | 1014 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 217 | 196 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 743 | 655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.904 | 2.917 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.148 | 11.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.144 | 0.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.692 | 1.617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 875 | 1231 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 875 | 1231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.476 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Atom Z3795 | Intel Celeron N2930 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Bay Trail |
Launch date | Q1'14 | 23 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 3138 | 3139 |
Processor Number | Z3795 | N2930 |
Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor Z Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.59 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.39 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
L1 cache | 224 KB | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1066 | DDR3L 1333 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 311 MHz | 313 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 778 MHz | 854 MHz |
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 25mm x 27mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | 4.5 W |
Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1170 |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
Number of USB ports | 5 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology |