Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8350
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.011 vs 0.24
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 55.944 vs 18.982
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.334 vs 0.079
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.487 vs 0.408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.011 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 55.944 vs 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.334 vs 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.487 vs 0.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
- Around 35% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.92 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 935 vs 472
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 905 vs 893
- 8.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1427 vs 168
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2203 vs 529
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.074 vs 1.185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 1.92 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 935 vs 472 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 905 vs 893 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1427 vs 168 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2203 vs 529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.074 vs 1.185 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8350
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 472 | 935 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 893 | 905 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 168 | 1427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 529 | 2203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.011 | 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 55.944 | 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.334 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.487 | 0.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.185 | 2.074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 380 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 380 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Merom |
| Launch date | Q1'16 | 18 August 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 2808 | 2816 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8350 | T7800 |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $515 | |
| Price now | $607.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.78 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.92 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | |
| Transistor count | 291 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.250V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-RS 1600 | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA592 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 1 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x1 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x5-Z8350 with others
IntelAtom x5-Z8350 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7800
IntelAtom x5-Z8350 vs
IntelPentium 2117U
IntelAtom x5-Z8350 vs
IntelAtom Z3735D
IntelAtom x5-Z8350 vs
AMDGX-217GA
