Intel Atom x5-Z8550 vs Intel Celeron 3965Y
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x5-Z8550 and Intel Celeron 3965Y processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8550
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 60% higher clock speed: 2.40 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 852 vs 824
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1603 vs 1059
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 852 vs 824
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1603 vs 1059
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 852 vs 824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1603 vs 1059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 852 vs 824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1603 vs 1059 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 3965Y
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 901 vs 667
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1194 vs 1156
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 373 vs 214
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 729 vs 708
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 608 vs 547
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 608 vs 547
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 901 vs 667 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1194 vs 1156 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 373 vs 214 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 729 vs 708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 608 vs 547 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 608 vs 547 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8550
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 3965Y
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8550 | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 667 | 901 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1156 | 1194 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 214 | 373 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 708 | 729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 547 | 608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 852 | 824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1603 | 1059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 547 | 608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 852 | 824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1603 | 1059 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x5-Z8550 | Intel Celeron 3965Y | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Kaby Lake |
| Launch date | Q1'16 | 21 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 2602 | 2603 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8550 | 3965Y |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $107 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.46 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.50 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 29.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1600 | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Device ID | 0x591E | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 615 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 20mm X 16.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1515 |
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 2 | 10 |
| Number of USB ports | 3 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x5-Z8550 with others
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
IntelCore i7-640LM
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
IntelCore i3-2310E
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
IntelCeleron 3965Y
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x5-Z8550 vs
AMDA4-9120e
