Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Core i5-2540M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1000M and Intel Core i5-2540M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1000M
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100 C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.683 vs 2.022
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 vs 20 February 2011 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 100 C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.683 vs 2.022 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2540M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 83% higher clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1408 vs 973
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2365 vs 1069
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 558 vs 325
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1221 vs 613
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 29.922 vs 15.87
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.227 vs 0.125
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.797 vs 0.621
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.022 vs 1.319
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1408 vs 973 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2365 vs 1069 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 558 vs 325 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1221 vs 613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.922 vs 15.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.227 vs 0.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.797 vs 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.022 vs 1.319 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1000M
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2540M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1000M | Intel Core i5-2540M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 973 | 1408 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1069 | 2365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 558 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 613 | 1221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.683 | 2.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.87 | 29.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.125 | 0.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | 0.797 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.319 | 2.022 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2055 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1000M | Intel Core i5-2540M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 | 20 February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $266 |
| Place in performance rating | 2829 | 2822 |
| Processor Number | 1000M | i5-2540M |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $89.97 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.38 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 149 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 624 Million |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | PPGA988, FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1000M with others
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T6670
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelCeleron B830
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelAtom Z3735F
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
AMDGX-217GA
