Intel Celeron 3205U vs Intel Core i7-4600U
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 3205U and Intel Core i7-4600U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 3205U
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 88.995 vs 30.46
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.51 vs 0.276
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2692 vs 2654
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2692 vs 2654
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 1 September 2013 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 88.995 vs 30.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.51 vs 0.276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2692 vs 2654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2692 vs 2654 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4600U
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 120% higher clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1655 vs 907
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2719 vs 947
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 672 vs 312
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1363 vs 592
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.333 vs 2.562
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 815 vs 756
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1667 vs 1565
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 815 vs 756
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1667 vs 1565
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1655 vs 907 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2719 vs 947 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 672 vs 312 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1363 vs 592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.333 vs 2.562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 815 vs 756 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 vs 1565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 815 vs 756 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 3205U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4600U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 3205U | Intel Core i7-4600U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 907 | 1655 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 947 | 2719 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 312 | 672 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 592 | 1363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.562 | 6.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 88.995 | 30.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.51 | 0.276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 756 | 815 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1565 | 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2692 | 2654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 756 | 815 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1565 | 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2692 | 2654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.202 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 3205U | Intel Core i7-4600U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 1 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $398 |
| Place in performance rating | 2153 | 2131 |
| Price now | $287.04 | |
| Processor Number | 3205U | i7-4600U |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.56 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Die size | 82 mm | 181 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1300 Million |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 100 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
| Device ID | 0xA16 | |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| VGA | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1 2x4 | 4x1, 2x4 |
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI support | ||
| Total number of SATA ports | 4 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 3205U with others
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
IntelXeon E5-2428L
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
IntelCore i3-4010U
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
IntelPentium N3710
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
AMDE1-6015
IntelCeleron 3205U vs
AMDR-272F
