Intel Celeron G1101 vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 551
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1101 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 551 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1101
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 73 Watt vs 84 Watt
Launch date | January 2010 vs June 2005 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 16 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 73 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 551
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.27 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 2.27 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1101
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 HT 551
Name | Intel Celeron G1101 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 551 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 929 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1086 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 916 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1039 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron G1101 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 551 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Clarkdale | Prescott |
Launch date | January 2010 | June 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | |
Place in performance rating | 2378 | 2366 |
Price now | $14.09 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.84 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | 551 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 81 mm | 112 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.27 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 382 million | 125 million |
Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 67.7°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.200V-1.425V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 1156 | PLGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 73 Watt | 84 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |