Intel Celeron G1101 vs AMD Athlon II X4 600e
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1101 and AMD Athlon II X4 600e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1101
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 2.27 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 929 vs 913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2010 vs October 2009 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.27 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 929 vs 913 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 600e
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 73 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1795 vs 1086
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 73 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1795 vs 1086 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1101
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X4 600e
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G1101 | AMD Athlon II X4 600e |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 929 | 913 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1086 | 1795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G1101 | AMD Athlon II X4 600e | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Clarkdale | Propus |
| Launch date | January 2010 | October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | $130 |
| Place in performance rating | 2388 | 2389 |
| Price now | $14.09 | $130.23 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 34.84 | 5.55 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 81 mm | 169 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.27 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 382 million | 300 million |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 1156 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 73 Watt | 45 Watt |