Intel Celeron G1820 vs AMD A8-5500B
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1820 and AMD A8-5500B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1820
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1540 vs 1325
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 565 vs 427
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.452 vs 3.418
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.945 vs 0.511
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | December 2013 vs October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1540 vs 1325 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 vs 427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 vs 3.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 vs 0.511 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5500B
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2609 vs 1718
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1184 vs 1036
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 90.111 vs 28.651
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.394 vs 0.235
- 19.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.819 vs 2.149
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2609 vs 1718 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 vs 1036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 90.111 vs 28.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.394 vs 0.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.819 vs 2.149 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1820
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500B
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron G1820 | AMD A8-5500B |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1540 | 1325 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1718 | 2609 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 | 427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1036 | 1184 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 | 3.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 | 90.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.235 | 0.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 | 0.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.149 | 41.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 612 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 612 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron G1820 | AMD A8-5500B | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Haswell | Trinity |
Launch date | December 2013 | October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $110 | |
Place in performance rating | 2434 | 2438 |
Price now | $75 | |
Processor Number | G1820 | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
Status | Launched | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.83 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Die size | 177 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Transistor count | 1400 million | 1178 million |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 1.7 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
VGA | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |